Wednesday, January 30, 2008
I wish to write this letter with reference to your recent column, "The child-man," which appeared in the Dallas Morning news on Sunday, January 2th.
I've been a men's rights advocate for just over a year, and I can't believe the continuing weapons-grade ignorance and brazen audacity that seems to accompany most women like yourself. If modern young women are frustrated by the lack of eligible men, then they have only themselves to blame; and what you may find even more troubling is that as a twenty-something University educated male, I have absolutely no sympathy for the plight of women my age. None. And neither do virtually all of my male peers. Your continued cries will continue to fall on increasingly ambivalent and apathetic ears . Your words signal a victory for men.
You see, you forget to give credit where credit is due. Men's rights advocates have for years now been telling men to avoid marriage at all costs. The phenomena that many young women find themselves unpleasantly experiencing when they suddenly realize that snapping their fingers is not enough to garner male attention anymore, is actually part of a concerted effort to achieve the exact result which you now lament; men achieving freedom from female domination. An entire generation of young men have grown up under the specter of misandrist divorce; they watched as "mom" gleefully took "dad" for everything he was worth and then some. Marriage, and the resulting divorce, has been the equivalent of a life sentence for far too many men now, it should come as absolutely no surprise that we've chosen to pursue traditionally masculine endeavors. That it does speaks volumes about the audacity, ignorance and stupidity of modern women. Common sense is not very common in women it seems. But more importantly, it overwhelmingly confirms the Men Going Their Own Way philosophy.
Women have consciously chosen to adopt a philosophy which preaches nothing but the destruction of men, and now they are being forced to accept responsibility for their foolish actions. Women have spent the past forty years doing everything they can to destroy the place of good men in western culture. We however, are not so easy to destroy. Would you treat a dangerous serpent as anything but what it is? That madame, is what women have made themselves into with regard to men.
So let this serve as a wake-up call for all the young frustrated women out there. Men will no longer agree to "change" for you.
If men do agree to take women back, and it would be an absolute gift at this point, then it will be on our terms and our terms alone. We will dictate, you will accept, or we will let you rot, and you'll deserve it.
You may think I'm simply a misogynist, and while this may be, you can rest assured that it is female-entitlement culture which has made me into what I am.
And now, I find that I've wasted more than enough time on an ingrate like you. I just bought a copy of Guitar Hero III: Legends of Rock, and playing it seems like a much better use of my time than spending any more time trying to make you understand that if women are unhappy, they have only themselves to blame. This situation was not made by men, it was made by women. The only question is, do they have enough balls to accept the responsibility?
Tuesday, January 22, 2008
A Toronto surgeon accused of twice having house-call sex with a female patient told the woman his surgery would transform her into a "sexy goddess," a disciplinary hearing heard yesterday.
Professional misconduct proceedings against Dr. Joseph Ka-Hoi Wong began at the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario yesterday with the testimony of his alleged victim whose identity is protected by a publication ban.
Wong denies allegations he had sex with the woman during two house calls to her apartment during a five-day period in January 2003.
The woman testified she first went to Wong's Scarborough office in January 2001 to have a scar on her forehead removed but before that initial consultation was over, the doctor talked her into breast augmentation surgery.
"You have the disposition or temperament of a virgin -- he said that in Chinese," the woman said Wong told her.
Although she didn't understand what he meant, she took it as a "compliment but not very professional."
Wong also said implants would improve her looks, she said.
"If you have bigger breasts, you will make most beautiful girl in the world," Wong said, according to the patient, who was testifying before the College's five-person disciplinary panel.
She also said the doctor used the Chinese word for "sexy goddess or sexy baby."
Prosecutor Shaun O'Brien said in her opening statement that Wong admits to making the house calls, but never made any notations in the patient's medical records to indicate what occurred during those visits.
The woman, meanwhile, continued to see Wong for another 17 months and didn't make any allegations public until October 2005.
Defence counsel Tracey Trenayne-Lloyd said in her opening statement that it is around that time the woman is recorded in a phone call demanding $100,000 from the doctor.
She also told the tribunal that the patient saw Wong 19 times and spent almost $20,000 on his services.
"There is no YouTube video of this patient and Dr. Wong having intercourse," Tremayne-Lloyd said. "This case is about credibility and nothing more or less than that." The hearing continues today.
Here's a stupid question: if you think your doctor is not professional, why do you not consult a different doctor? Answer: because you are in some way complicit with that doctor's lack of professionalism!If the situation was different, say, if my doctor ever tried to shill something stupid like penis-enlargement pills, they would no longer be my doctor! Like everything else, there's something that we're not being told about this story.
Making headlines this week is the story that Toronto doctor killed his wife, who had just won the lottery.
NEWMARKET -- A prominent Thornhill gynecologist told police he could have killed his wife and former $5-million lottery winner in ways that could never be detected, a jury heard yesterday.
"If I was serious about murdering my wife, there are, uh, uh, (ways) I could have taken," Dr. Joseph Roncaioli told Det. Richard McVeity in an taped interview played at his trial.
In the videotaped statement taken fours years ago, Roncaioli, 72, then pinpointed a deadly but undetectable spot on the detective's neck.
"I can kill you in two seconds," Roncaioli said, tapping on the position where he'd insert an ice pick. "I'm not stupid.
"What do you do when you have a general anesthetic? You put people to death and then you bring them back to life ... there are ways ... to kill my wife and I could have done it in very different ways that are non-detectable."
Roncaioli continued that, "there's an old saying in medicine: Shit happens and that's what happened."
The doctor was charged with manslaughter after giving the statement -- six months after his wife, Ibi, 67, died on July 20, 2003. He has pleaded not guilty.
Roncaioli explained that on that day he twice administered local anesthetics to his wife -- once in the morning and again in the afternoon -- to draw blood samples to diagnose her illness.
He said her health had been suffering for six months.
Crown attorney Martin Dionne alleges Roncaioli killed his wife with a lethal cocktail of two local anesthetics -- Lidocaine and Bupiucaine -- and failed to call 911.
"I didn't think a little anesthetic was going to kill somebody," Roncaioli told McVeity.
"My intentions were honourable, but the result was disastrous and it was unintentional." Source
Somethings fishy about this one. General anesthetic to draw blood? At least he's getting a fair trial. Of course, the headline reads, "MD: 'I can kill you in two seconds.'" Looks like the misandrist media has already decided his guilt.